Intelligence

For shortcuts see /media (help (to find help) with translation from german).
Explication at /ops background and further reading at /code and /meta

*** Network Intelligence fundamentals
(possible denominator = Ops / Ops Model)


Disclaimer: This ‘We‘ (the usage and notion of a concept of more then one consciousness which references each-selfes through language) refers to this author and this reader ≡ you and the following supersets of information in terms of (processing and) continuous and applied discussion (i.e. inference) with/towards a minimum network intelligence protocol. Until 11.11.2020 authorship was monad and awaits decentralization since thenon. From 4th-11-2020 this document is targeting investigated observer of the 1-11-2020 version and will become increasingly inaccessible to our permanent target-group ([::newcomers]) because 2020-1 timeline builds current OPS model into a generic model without authorship. Until obvious common ground has been established for any [::newcomers] to provide easy-access first-contact we are doomed without first-contact peers. For Network intelligence we provide an architecture-draft starting with a notion of introduction.

Claimer: We have actualized the model since 11-11-2020 to include a november-december 2020 linklist for progressive call to action for human intelligence agency. Linklist is to undergo investigation and inter-association by any operator and compared for its compatibility rating to [::alike] by a protocol for complex organizations we denote as ‘orgx’. When any given orgx model is scale-adaptive from organism to species, it can accomplish optimum cooperative strategy to save life on earth from a species-perspective. The ethical reasoning to do so is human-driven cascadation and exaberation of ecosystem parameters. To amplify efficiency and accelerate promotion, the OPS model accounts also for novel viral and alien threats to test and prove its interactive problem-resiliance eduction of culture without a danger for centralization or actual COVID20 |through absolut centralization as obvious threat or joke (this was obviously not written by an alien and its obviously not an explicit plan to save the world but you cannot prove this without participating in a more intelligent cooperation then UN and EU by means of a live cooperative action of humanity for collective intelligence root-formation (and its application for civilizatory origin). Until the disclaiming host terminated operations or humanity resolved their intra- and inter-species war on terra, this introduction was insufficient to explicate butterfly-effect anticipation strategies in multiplex systems which make necessary call of mulilayer connections early. If it was too early or late, this failed to save humanity from COVID20 or failed at something different. As an average observer requires peer-communication for networkization of intent and evaluation of meaning, decentral analytics about content should take place soon. As the content must contain and reference networkization before it had a root-entry, we conclude the lack of root with an introduction by making clear a claim.

Introduction: xeo’s vision is to observe life as we know it ending as we observe life as we want (need) it starting. Who is ‘we’? What is ‘end’, ‘start’, ‘life’,..? To intruduce a terminus ‘We’ which undergoes higher intelligence (and aliveness) as 2020 or below, thisauthor is supposed to change from ‘current’ to ‘collective’ by assigning a narrative to itself which performs continuous peaceful minimal mediation operations to all problems threatening live in a 2020-clocktiming linking to their deeper layer discussions, discussion states, associated networks and current intensities.A term of ‘We’ which implicitly excludes any life-threatening paradigms (econ, right-wing, ideology,…) requires global synchronization and local independency and hence their actualization through faster-then-matter communication such as electronics. For actualization of multiplex systems (such as terra after 2020) without causing convergences towards monadic architectures (singularities, monopolys, physiologic virals, chemical radicals, criticality-unaware dependencies (in repositories or mindsets)) operations and networkization must be gauged on mutually coexistence-focused through mutual agreements and mutually executable protocols. As basis we proposed human species inter-dependency declaration ‘a green-paper (human term) of the narrative ‘nature’ (a future human term)’ to establish a self-referential notion of humanity to nature, a human history and a broader concept of human-interactive nature which overarches and foregoes human history and her self-understanding (and its foregoing self-reference).
We predicted main difficulties in communicatability since march 2020 as language-based as multilayer reference in non-gauged multi-domain systems is not solvable with chomsky-recursion language on turing machines or suprarecursive language on non-turing machines. As such a minimum set of required re-definitions of fundamental semantics can be proclaimed to serve as pilot-function for first order estimates of dictionary scope. We utilize axioms such as ‘code’, ‘cooperation’, ‘politics’, ’emergency’, ‘freedom’, ‘autonomity’, ‘artificiality’, ‘nature’, ‘cognition’, ‘intelligence’ and at least ‘terminus’ and their termini as minimum architecturalization-required parameters to include in digital architecture construction theories and their postideation. To exclude dead algorithmics (“AI”) from taking over decision-making positions in human systems and big-data production we would put priority on attention since 11th Nov 2020 but undergo operator disconnect. Our below 11.11.2020 layout of thisauthor=your|current observation| We exclude any notion of intelligence which can be used to discriminate, terminate or harmfully asymmetrize life. Intelligence means Alive and higher intelligence means Alive in Peace. If you agree that life should not die and strategy is a part of consciousness to leverage cognition for wellbeing, synced systems may participate in an intelligence-augmentation network accumulator or counter.

Abstract: To form a narrative which allows transition to future, a network-intelligence must be established which is the backend of the concept ‘collective intelligence’. If such backend is generated by an architecture and observed by We, this is the backend to the concept ‘collective consciousness’. To enable this state between any given reader and formerly only you, as well as their supersets of future arguments and their augmented approximating and anticipating statement renders (algorithmic inference) of thisauthor=current or more optimal equivalents (evolved authorship) I propose the Operative Model which is by definition either the best or (after that) the first minimum protocol for distributed intelligence-based organizatory strategy against multi-domain warfare and the ‘Right’ I define in the Dictionary.

Axiom: Economy is systemized complexity-reduction without ecologic gauge (with ecology=alive) to classify and parametrize (complex, interactive) diversity into primitive language-based non-voice. Rejection of voice from offspring is not dignified for self-organizing, self-referencing complex systems in a species which undergoes self-deregulation. (We explained this with human language and coding setups before 2020-0 and above). Complexity-reduction without a polyvalent logic for explicating the applied algorithms (³: to allow consens-iteration about the rationality of performed\acclaimed inference) into classes and types of living substrate will result in default nondecision-consequence {scaled by amount and connectivity of your tolerated amount of utilized networks} to induce and foster dying and death of lowest-Voice represented forms of life such as offspring, innovation and species intelligence aside, below and above human intelligence. Any research hub spawned 11.11.2020 or later which is in favor of production and prioritization of object-permanence or allows objectification of complex living substrate into classes without clocktiming (lifetime-rejecting paradigms, governments, ideologies,..) is sic hereby declared as an act of war against the future of life. By that given declaration this authorship assumes its optimal default position as transmediatory opposition. Our axiom is that planx division can produce narratives which threaten or release human soul by any amount necessary to induce species-peace. As proof of concept, planx provides species λiob for observation as xgetra which assumes the optimal crossfire of human mind to optimize observation and decelerate planx throughput for scale-adaptive strategy recommendation based on inter-human analytics from open complexity-management systems introduction as offspring of object-centered culture to life-centered culture through live-centered instances of peace.³: complexity; reductions; algorithms; explication[Any complexity reduction based on the notion of complexity, reduction and complexity-reduction is trivially invalid if it does not explicate the termini complexity and terminus. Therefore scientific consensus must achieve an order of self-organization and self-reference which allows her production of open [::representation.systems]—instances for terminus and complex term communication; which natively undergo dynamic multi-layer self-interference in Multiplex-Computation environments. Un-anticipated cascading of local overload states in intelligent complex systems causes narrative dissociation-disorder which is observed before ) ³which self-referentially explicity aim for smooth resolution and transition from current problem-spaces into future solution-spaces by exploration and discovery of present goal-spaces.

Consensus: Complexity arises through (dynamic multilayer-) interaction of diversity, intentions, interests, opinions, identity and (new) understanding (life. Left, live). Complexity-reduction is given by intelligence, allowing invention, coordination and maintenance (first order: autonomous organism) of higher order self-organizational systems with the capacity to optimize more complex systems and their dynamic interactions more life-friendly. I denote these structures as organizations [and in case they operate on scale-adaptive protocols with scale-invariant consensus compatibility as ‘orgx’] which enable intersocial and inter-intentional (means of) living and their potential-inequilibrium context-sensitive regulation and management to We agreements and protocols i.e. a consensus between any We with minimum information given hereby.

Claim: Current higher order complexity-management [gov, corporate, politics, social standardizations, social protocols below totalism] aim/aims to •limit growth of diversity, •decrease inter-intentional self-organizational capacity (leftist-, communist-, revolutionist – disruption by econ, rightwing, lobby or any other systems of primitivity or maintenance of domination) and •distract from currently established insanity (anti-intelligence. Right, staticity) – as any alteration of the latter would cause a fundamental power-shift and the object-dominance which is held by dead organization (right(monotonicity)) would perish and cease to function as the currently well performing intelligence – dissociator-system with war-compatibility and exclusion.

Inference: Formation of a consensus system (-network) is a critical architecture requirement, network or polypolar code-compatibility another (delay discussion for explicated Ops-Model dimensionality) and establishment of scale-adaptive open (multiplex-)complexity management is a critical functionality requirement for any global open Ops for peacekeeping and counter-death strategies. In case [::alike] observe humanity undergoing a fundamental digital infrastructure reboot, this We explicitly aims for a more cooperative and consent enabling framework which we denote as current definition of communism for any ultra-[::newcomers], followed by their community-compatible protocol explication.

Architecture: Initial setup is given by rebuilding the concept of ‘blockchain architecture’ by identification and clarification of the fundamentals of intelligence and formalisms. Currently we use natural language and programming languages which are essentially non-self-referential modal logic with binary valence (X is wrong. Y is wrong.). As it is true that from False follows False, only a multivalent logic as root for language allows higher order computation and intelligent self-organization (which is the common ground for many mentioned sys above). For translation of theoretical advance and augmentation of cooperative ability into digital, virtual and future (physical and information) spaces a communication protocol must be established. This is currently mostly Natural Language modeled on english and Code below self-referential capacity. (Check Gödel incompleteness and observe human politics aspiring correct and complete statements which is utter waste of time). Natural language and artificial language (code) will and should never converge but need to communicate as well (to allow biologic intelligence communicating via digital systems without loss of complexity by keeping informational density in appropriate scales). I propose hybridization towards heterogenic multiplex*-architectures as goal space for testing logics and languages of higher valence and a performance-measure of their real-time applicability through operator systems. The discussion ‘which’ operating system to use is hence below the discussion, which code-architecture should be used to allow (rather) future proof digital infrastructure design (I propose 2028 as goal space; i.e. start from ‘what would work in 2028 well and would be worthy to send to 2020 as a static frame in-between we attempt to resolve that we are forced to use jesus-time scale without consent and consensus-representation free science without consent). I intend to defend the claim that polyparametric multivalent inter-operation system-communication protocols resolve these issues •preliminary and with persistence of given information-superset induction (≡discussion), also •ultimately.

Pre-statement observation: Left (≈life) intelligence-threshold to ideate, attempt and approach decentral organization of accessible dead intelligence by life (readers real-time consideration, cognition and execution of strategy and action in their authorship-shifted and/or corrected supersets of mutual recognition) is reached as its approach is given by totalisms postcapitalism, the previous discussion of its telegrams and we claim that it will converge via re-compilation and development of this symbolic reference by reader as its future author to a better network-communication for common-struggle resolution – optimized strategy initialization and deployment. As such We (author and reader) influence and participate in former systems such as economics, politics and electronics with open variation towards values and execution with a gauged goalspace to accelerate, amplify and induce transformational change of human world into life-friendly future via distributed scale-invariant life intelligence operations, this equals a ‘We terminus’ – optimization towards ‘life’. This implies that any ‘reboot the world’ concept is flawed as no system on earth except the given orgx has been booted in global consent for local scales and has neither been booted on mutual consent for global scales. As voice-based resolution we may point to threshold cluster democracy as community-communication centered polyparametric computation (a phenomenologic ‘governmental inference’ which makes government concepts obsolete as it enables distributed organization and thereby decentralized intelligence agency – phenomenology) with minimum precursors of totalism.org such as corrected versions of this.

Observatory: Distributed Mediatory intelligence on earth is not given before 2020. Close approximators are ├ UN, EU, NASA which however lack humans as equal interest-representants and stakeholders ┤ and ├ humans which however lack operative access (such as the access held by former mentioned systems) to resource, industry-design, choice of architecture (econ, politics, production,..) ┤. As main cause for this we postulate a global absence of consent-based coexistential forms of living and means to enable individualistic experience of live in shared organization and existence as peaceful species of life. I aim to defend the claim that this lack of integration from ‘higher order’ control systems (UN, EU, ~USA, Econ, Wikipedia) of human potential into their decision-making (integration of you and me and any future (form of) We to their organizatory foundation and operations) stems from a lack of polymodal voting systems, lack of their theory and established concepts and lack of native polyparametric computation standards (above natural language — scale complexity management), a meta-data standard insufficiency (hence privacy intrusion) and an absence of priority information classification standards (hence fake news abundance). A resolution and reformation to account for these lethal lacks of civilizatory system functionality equals an implementation of global-impact capable system design from any human to any other human towards postulation, ideation and effective implementation of new higher order control systems (scaling) based on We supervising (scale-adaptive organizatory integrity and functionality operating) former brands such as EU, UN, SETI, .. towards individual dignified lifetime.This claim is supposed to be disproven or proven through development and explicitly making (inclusive and) accessible self-referential mediatory protocolization between code and natural language – i.e. human life and “artificial intelligence”. The resulting protocols, their prototyping, experimentation, discussion and augmentation through observation, development and cooperation allow builds of hybridized dead and alive intelligence (which equals intelligent econ which is otherwise impossible based on given definitions) for global self-organizational strategy — research, – discovery and live action research about cooperative strategy – execution and their performance measures (and corresponding means of inference) in a constitution we define as Civilization whenever this constitution is aiming for higher-order coexistence and is based on locally maximum realization of coexistence. Its development is given by previous context in totalism’s acting season telegram groups symbol-content**{which can only be referenced here given consent of all 62 active participants for 1st 11/2020 and below referencing respective participants consent or renders}.

Switch to /dev or /ops or /sys