orgx

Congratulations, you conquered the menu.

This is the root-page for application at world from me, Dominic default.

Startup-Deck — Pitchdeck — Elevator Pitch — PitchUp!

The frame for our discussion and research of the orgx model is a means to formalize and standardize pitching and startup design. Through standardization, automation of registry, submission and advanced filtering can be achieved.

We intend to contracst our work by means of generality and common usne.
We will compose an application-Deck, based on 17th/11/2020 version of hive.org¹ and referenced the current Gen Z Mafias ‘Pitchdeck-mentality’² and masterclass outline for elevator pitches³. We changed the Structure of the deck to be more general, account for a broader range of submissions, ease processing and filtering of stakeholders, cooperators, users and investors through polyparametric explication. [Differenciation of the startup, its concept and the underlying strategy — since xeo.ceo with explicit reference to a concept ‘collective intelligence’ towards a trivial and obvious referencer which is the research discipline of theoretical and applied collective intelligence]

°The Goal-space of this is the orgx protocol
¹https://www.hive.org/entrepreneurship/startup-deck/
²https://discord.com/invite/7978DEa
³https://www.masterclass.com/articles/how-to-craft-the-perfect-elevator-pitch#how-to-craft-the-perfect-elevator-pitch

0. Context and Abstract
• Name, field, architecture, class, realtime-links, clocktiming, contact.
• Explication of points 1 to 6 through a consistent narrative
(Expliation of a narrative may be understood as ‘writing, introducing and contextually referencing the application as an entity’. Hence, a narrative tends to contain the team or team’s narrative but explicates towards a self-reference of self-organization about a [concept [submitting towards a receptor [via clear context]]]. Here, context is ‘startup’ (or more general, application/submission), Receptors are Yonah.Org and FORMWELT.info and the concept is a protocol to allow optimized innovation identification, enabling of complex solutions, hybrid and experimental startup-decks for action research analytics.
• With a positioning from X to some external Y we mean how the narrating entity perceives other actors and agents which are active or can become active in the field. A broad (and qualitative) scope of ‘alike’ network and startups shows advanced analytics but can clog the presentation.
• For positioning we recommend minimally a ‘taken note of’ which means, the applying entity has at least knowledge of a referenced system. A positioning can contain a state of intend in form of dissociation or association (‘we do not share goals like..’ and/or ‘we share goals like..’). It can contain a state of intend towards future interaction or evolution of the referenced system.
• For clear narrative and qualitative positioning towards peer-networks, a composition is recommended how the field and its morphology (definitions, consensus) are aproached by the submitting entity. Common narratives are project-lead, observer, developer, architect or innovator. For explication we produce clear parameters and polyparametric models for higher order network interaction and co-dynamics.

1. The Team.
• Team/Workforce
• Advisors/Associates
• Mentors/Backup.

2. The Problem.
• Problem description and evidence of the demand for this solution.
• clearly illustrate that you understand what the problem is.
• clear plan to go about solving it.
• You know for whom you are solving this problem.
• Explicate which domains contribute to the problem and which are intended to operate on solution.

3. The Solution.
• Schematics, Prototype, wireframes, mockups, 3-D printed version of concept and multi-modal representation.
• timeline for creation and any key milestones, sprints, predictions, guidelines.
• discuss future development and startup, start, up, accelerator relation
• target market development and adaption

4. Implementation of Solution in a GoalSpace.
• source-reservoir for parts, components, modules necessary to create digital or tangible system.
• Challenges faced and facing.
• Code and Systems operations (former Intellectual property, patents)
• Analytics, abstact on target space /goalspace and describe its chronographic stage of evolution.
• Characteristic Space-properties, timings, clocktiming, flop-rates, overall flops of system which represents / measures space.
• Uniqueness and Cooperate Ability.
• Capability to deploy a morphology and identify redundancy/synergy.
• Outline future evolution and impact.

5. The Regulatory Model.
• Applied Token-exchange systems and explication and positioning towards other models of (economic) system regulation and self-organization
• Assemble Conscious pool of available/active tokens and token-models (-systems) with scale-adaptive integration into the Implementation

6. Interlinking to real-world frames.
• Clear timeline and narrative of implementation as Ansatz to efficiently solve a (complex) problem in a dynamic (multiplex) environment with multi-scale clocktimings.
• Positioning towards class of ‘startup’ as means of implementation, limits and underlying decision/strategy
• Explicate self-reference as concept which is transitioning towards/as startup into observer-sphere (first submission-date tracker).
• Positioning towards accelerator-, pre-seed think-tanking, think-tank—ecosystem interconnection
• Explication of frames as self-consistent measure of operators multiscale callibration (recommendation of registry with multi-tag frame repository for communications and complexity-processing)

7. Current state and present operations.
• We composed this page early 17th November. We plan to publish four root-subdomains about xeo.ceo as independent system and autonomous intelligence agency with open explication to serve as potential network-intelligence root or gauge-network for protocol-evolution (= formalism-augmentation).

Reflection: We develop/model our /Terms based on https://uplink.weforum.org/uplink/s/terms in some timeline.

We develop/model our /Privacy based on https://uplink.weforum.org/uplink/s/privacy-policy in the same timeline.

We can actualize our /Service after our submission has been peer-reviewed and the evaluation has been processed.

Termina. The re-formulation and actualization of a complex context we call re-compilation. A summation and inference of available but fixed information we call compilation. If an instance has a fully iterated self-reference, we name this an implex. If a system is self-positioning (i.e. semantically complete and correct explicating to the current environment systems maximum gauge) it is identical to its implex.

A ‘service of term’ refers to our work and release of protocols which contain termini and definitions, mostly for cooperative attempts and services. We could’ve branded and licensed many aspects, we instead put it to a field test. Hence, the authorship of our LAR approach identifies the ‘We’ as researching system and foremost an observation. As we cannot undertake observation without a frame of reference, xeo is introduced as maximum error value for a default parameter. The more parameter a context computes, the more will polyparametricity characterize the computation. As we aspire a neutral reference we use the given biology as neutral ID and hence root it on the semantic notion of ‘neutral’ which corresponds in english and german well.

We develop/model a /Policy – system based on a Greepaper from the narrative of Life, titled ‘Nature Policy’, a Whitepaper on inter-code standards, polyparametric metadata, encryption- and compression-routines, network-intelligence protocols titled ‘Operative Policy’ and a Research-Paper about distributed (repository/vault-) systems for User-Intelligence and Open diversity-collective Information-systems, titled ‘Open Policy’. The Green-, White- and Research-Paper are (meta-)modeled as “gamified counterparts to themselves” by an alien narrative. The reports on the Policy development will take place via /research and is currently limited to /bsc which has the external hook /exo and provides a draft for our service as a startup-deck at /pitchdeck.

Startup-Deck — Pitchdeck — Elevator Pitch < 1up

¹https://www.hive.org/entrepreneurship/startup-deck/
²https://discord.com/invite/7978DEa
³https://www.masterclass.com/articles/how-to-craft-the-perfect-elevator-pitch#how-to-craft-the-perfect-elevator-pitch

As simplex we understand the minimum set of PARAM for a system of a specified class. For a simplex of life we claim an implicit necessity for polyparametricity. For a simplex of communication, we research the concepts Startup-Deck, Narrative, Explication and cosync. We build on the 17th/11/2020 version of hive.org¹ startup deck recommendations and attempted a frame of Octobers Gen Z Mafias ‘Pitchdeck-mentality’². We changed the Structure of the deck to be more general, account for a broader range of submissions, ease processing and filtering for stakeholders, cooperators, users and investors through polyparametric explication which allows a new standard of operations and start-up engineering with a better goal-space resolution and clocktiming.

We link the three application formats • evelator-pitch, • pitchdeck and • Startup-Deck and propose that all three concepts and notions can be embedded in a normative format which positions the submitting entity and concept context-specific but generally accessible. We base this proposition on the default logic LMR and its derivate for this case. To research future common application-norm for accelerators, peer-seed and seed-stage projects, startups, investment-networking, efficient dynamic cooperations as well as open personal applications for peer-2-peer cooperation we outline the Multiplex One as experimentation hub / concept incubator. For personal application we refer to a peer-to-peer cooperation as descendant to work and token-regulation as descendant to economy.

[Differenciation of proposal, innovation, startup, organization and the 2020 clocktiming of global complex problems and complex multilayer dynamics in the post 2020 world. We research a distributed cooperation and operation-coordination model (while both models engaged with synchronization will approximate complexity-management). We intend to contribute to advance human organization and self-organization in terms of cooperative sustainable strategy and life-friendly conscious operations. We reference a concept ‘collective intelligence’ and define it towards a trivial and obvious referencer in-between xeo.ceo and any observer. This referencer would be given by the research discipline of theoretical and applied collective intelligence and public, civilization-wide accessible resources and systems for cultural evolution and co-existence as diversity collective of human species].

Elevator pitches
These ptiches serve all sorts of purposes, but the basic ingredients are the same. Here are some tips for creating your own elevator pitch:

[last update 13:42PM, 21st Nov. 2020]

w.i.p. / not started working. Below is the original from Masterclass.com

  1. Have a clear objective. The first step to crafting your own elevator pitch is to have a clear and simple goal for the pitch. If you’re trying to sell a product and explain your new small business venture and include your own biography, chances are you’ll end up with a muddled and ineffective pitch. The perfect elevator pitch has a limited scope and is crafted around a single venture or business.
  2. Provide a brief setup. Once you’ve decided what you’re pitching, decide the best way to lay out a quick explanation of what it is. If you’re selling a product, explain the problem it solves and how it functions. If you’re selling yourself, give a few bullet points about your skills and experience. A good elevator pitch provides key points upfront that help orient the person you’re pitching to and lay the groundwork for a sale.
  3. Talk about your unique selling proposition. Whether you’re selling yourself or a new product, it’s imperative that you highlight what separates you or your product from the pack. The first part of an elevator pitch is spent answering the question “Who are you?” while the second part demonstrates what makes you stand out.
  4. Make your pitch versatile. Your elevator pitch should be usable in any location. You never know where you might run into potential employers or interested investors. You should be able to pitch at a networking event, career fair or, of course, an actual elevator. An elevator pitch is a verbal business card that showcases who you are and what you do in a simple and versatile way.
  5. Be engaging. Rather than just reciting your work experience and current job title with a few industry buzzwords thrown in, tap into what makes you passionate about your work and showcase that in your delivery. It’s important to summon your communication skills and demonstrate to the person you are pitching to that you are motivated and invested. If you’re pitching a new small business, the investor you are pitching to should be left thinking about how incredibly passionate and interested you are in your new venture.
  6. Realize that practice makes perfect. You have a limited amount of time to deliver an elevator pitch, but you have all the time in the world to perfect it. Before you ever give an elevator pitch out in the real world, you should spend ample time honing your message and practicing your delivery at home. This way you’ll have a well-rehearsed and polished pitch that you won’t be speaking aloud for the first time when you meet a potential employer.
  7. Follow up after the pitch. An elevator pitch is all about making a great first impression, but your job doesn’t end there. Sometimes you may not be able to provide your contact information to the person you are pitching. In that case, it may be worth tracking down their information so you can follow up.

W.i.p. is taking place on local harddrive and on totalism.org-pads